(Ported in from Tumblr, for those who don’t want to deal with its data ToS…)<\/p>\n
\ntall-tree-tales<\/span> asked:<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\nHi Diane! I\u2019ve been a huge fan of your Star Trek work for years (and will now be investigating your original fiction I wasn\u2019t previously aware of) and am absolutely thrilled to find you have an active blog.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/blockquote>\n
\nI did a cursory search through your tags but didn\u2019t see anything answering this so forgive me if you\u2019ve already gone over this, but how do you go about publishing work that belongs to an already established franchise like Star Trek? Is it just through the publisher? Do you go to some branch of Paramount\/CBS and get their approval for the story content? I\u2019d love to know the process. I\u2019m assuming with all the new Star Trek content these days, and CBS locking down on what\u2019s \u201ccanon\u201d, it\u2019s probably more difficult to get a one off novel published using their IP anymore. I\u2019d love to hear your thoughts on this (or be directed to a post where you\u2019ve already explained).<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<\/div>\n
\nThank you for all your wonderful work!<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<\/div>\n
\nYou’re very welcome! I hope you find my original work at least as enjoyable as the Trek.\u00a0 \ud83d\ude42<\/p>\n<\/div>\n
\nRe the business of working with an established franchise: yep, we’ve dealt with that here before, every now and then. But the tagging has been (admittedly) uneven. So let me just come at it again. \ud83d\ude42 (Always adding the note that this is how I<\/em> did it, back in the day, and the methods or pathways of access may have changed.)<\/p>\n<\/div>\n
\n…So how did I get to be a published Star Trek novelist?<\/p>\n
I am a first-generation Star Trek fan. I fell in love with ST:TOS* as soon as it premiered, and immediately started writing fanfic in that universe. (It should be mentioned here that\u2014a couple\/few decades before the days of widespread internet-connectedness\u2014not only did I have no idea that other people were doing something very similar, but I had no idea it even had a name.<\/i> I was writing all alone, in a vacuum, with no support whatsoever\u2026 but however accidentally, I\u2019d discovered something invaluable: it made me happy.<\/i> We\u2019ll come back to this later.)<\/p>\n
So. Time went by and I slid from that genre of fanfic-writing into writing fic that was much more Tolkienian in genre, and from there, into writing original fiction that Tolkien would have found, well, rather different.<\/i> Cutting another longish story short, in 1978\/9 I sold and had published my first novel, this one\u2014the initial volume in the LGBTQ-and-poly-ish Tale of the Five \/ Middle Kingdoms series<\/a> that would later get me shortlisted two years running for the Astounding<\/em> Award for best new writer in the SF\/fantasy field.<\/p>\n
Now when something like this happens to you, it gets a lot easier to pitch new novels to people. I\u2019m not just talking about the increased attention that awards and nominations bring you. But just having a traditionally-published book out<\/i> tells other potential publishers that you\u2019ve mastered at least some important aspects of the novelist business: (a) being able to conceive of a plot that will sustain a novel-length work, (b) being able to go from concept to starting in on a novel, \u00a9 being able to finish<\/i> a novel, and (d) being able to cope with the editorial process\u2014handling suggested edits, dealing with a copyedited manuscript, dealing with proofs, etc etc.<\/p>\n
As it happens, while I was dealing with the sequelae to publishing The Door Into Fire<\/i>\u2014meaning the inevitable question \u201cAnd what are you going to do next?\u201d\u2014I’d also been doing some typing for an acquaintance who was typewriter-challenged. They were writing a Star Trek novel. And I have to say that what I was typing up for them was giving me hives. It was\u2026not anything<\/i> like what I thought a Star Trek novel should look like. I remember saying to a friend or two, on the quiet, \u201cI could eat a ream of typing paper and barf<\/i> a better Star Trek novel than this.\u201d And finally one of them\u2014almost certainly David Gerrold, who (God love him) has a history of daring me into doing things I want to do anyway\u2014turned around and called my bluff and said, \u201cAll right, go on then, quit your kvetching and just go do it.\u201d<\/i><\/p>\n
Which left me staring at the problem with a lot more intent. Fine, you\u2019re going to pitch a novel to Trek: what story are you going to tell?<\/i> It\u2019s not like you\u2019re constrained by a TV budget here. Stretch out and tell the biggest Star Trek story you can find: one that can only <\/i>be told, or best <\/i>told, in this universe. (This being my working \u201cprime criterion\u201d for stories told in other people\u2019s universes. For best effect the story should only be capable of being told within that <\/i>set of characters and circumstances. The jewel must be cut to suit the setting, not<\/i>\u2014however counterintuitive it might seem\u2014not<\/i> the other way around.)<\/p>\n
So I sat with that concept for a while, and eventually the right idea, or set of ideas, presented itself. I can vividly remember the moment. I was sitting on a bus bench near Victory and White Oak in the San Fernando Valley when the idea hit. It was a long time before cellphones, so I had to wait an hour or so to get home so I could call my agent and say \u201cDon, guess what? I\u2019m going to write a Star Trek novel!\u201d<\/i><\/p>\n
There was the briefest pause, after which he said, only half joking: \u201cDo you have to?\u201d Because both of us knew perfectly well that from Paramount\u2019s point of view, Star Trek novels were merely another kind of merchandising, like plastic phasers and James T. Kirk action figures. (And strictly speaking, regardless of how we love them, they still are.) \u2026But then Don said,\u00a0\u201cOkay, do an outline and we\u2019ll see what they think.\u201d<\/p>\n
And so I wrote the outline, and my agent sent it along to the editor of the Trek books at Pocket\u2014who was then Dave Hartwell (God rest him, a fabulous editor of any and all kinds of SF)\u2014and Dave read it and liked it, and he sent it to Paramount for approval, and they<\/i> read it and liked it, and gave Dave the go-ahead to buy it. And that turned into The Wounded Sky. <\/i>(A nice overview is here<\/a>. But I am also charmed to tell you that this book has its own entry at TV Tropes<\/a>.) As a tied-for-second novel went\u2014So You Want To Be A Wizard<\/i> <\/a>was written at very nearly the same time\u2014it doesn\u2019t seem to have done too badly.<\/p>\n
Anyway, after that got written and turned in and published, the people at Pocket\u2014somewhat to my surprise\u2014said to me, \u201cOkay, what have you got for us next?\u201d\u00a0 It was that simple\u2026 and I was that lucky. I liked working with them: they liked working with me: and they liked what I\u2019d done enough to ask for more. (And…though I have no data on this… I strongly suspect the first book sold well.) So I was in for eight novels more, spread over a fair bit of time. And I have one more plot lying around that I should really get in touch with present editorial about and see if there\u2019s any interest. You never can tell\u2026<\/p>\n
So that\u2019s how I<\/i> did it. Everybody else\u2019s mileage will inevitably vary. But I don\u2019t think there\u2019s going to be much argument with the idea that before working with other IP-holders in their worlds, you might usefully first do as much work as possible in your own. That way potential publishing partners will have something to look at to help them get a sense of what your voice sounds like outside<\/i> someone else\u2019s world.<\/p>\n
\u2026Now as for working with someone else\u2019s IP\u2014anyone\u2019s\u2014this is how I manage it.<\/p>\n
(a) Remember it\u2019s <\/i>theirs.<\/i><\/b> They were there before you arrived and will doubtless be there long after you\u2019re gone. They own that property, are likely enough to have worked hard on it in their time, and\u2014whether they originated it or are just its buyers\u2014are almost certainly powerfully protective of it. You can press against the edges of their envelope\u2014quite hard, if you\u2019re careful and have permission\u2014but break through the fabric of their corporate reality without warning and you are going to be in deep trouble.<\/p>\n
Do your homework.<\/i> Know your licensor: know their history with other creators. Find out where there have been problems in the past and keep your eyes open for warning signs that you may be about to discover some new one. If you were lucky enough to be invited in, act like a considerate houseguest (creatively speaking). While working in that universe, don\u2019t (for example) sneakily attempt to jettison parts of the property that annoy you, or covertly subvert bits that seem to call for subversion. (Overt <\/i>subversion is a different story. Be in communication with your IP owner about this, and you may be able to win them over.\u00a0 [Though you should be prepared for them to take credit for this after the fact.] But I have seen people disinvited from franchises with extreme <\/i>prejudice after they were caught trying to pull one or another kind of \u201cfast one\u201d on their publisher.) If there\u2019s a work-with-us guide or in-house bible, sleep with it under your pillow.<\/p>\n
(b) Know your subject\/universe.<\/i> KNOW it. It is an absolute certainty that no matter how well you think you know it, there are fans out there who know it better than you do\u2014massively, obsessively, eat-drink-and-sleep<\/i>-ively better\u2014 and if you put a foot wrong, they will come for you.<\/i> Leaving aside the issue of not wanting to be left looking like an idiot on the Internet, you ought in any case to be deeply cognizant of your host-world\u2019s internal verities before you can expect to write it flexibly and well.<\/p>\n
\u2014And add (b1) to this: Know your characters\u2019 voices.<\/i> Not just the way they phrase things, but the way they think about things and (possibly more importantly) feel<\/i> about things. It\u2019s not you the readers will have come for. It\u2019s them.<\/i> You must channel the core characters at the very <\/i>least authentically, and (ideally) affectionately, or it\u2019ll all end in tears.<\/p>\n
For the duration of this work, you are in service to them. Treat them courteously and give them your best words to speak; but always in their own voices. Don\u2019t be afraid to let them be more real than you are. For a lot of people, unquestionably, they are.<\/i> If that\u2019s a problem for you, you shouldn\u2019t be doing this kind of work. (At least not more than once.)<\/p>\n
\u00a9 Don\u2019t do it for money. Don\u2019t do it for fame. Do it for love or not at all.<\/i> …Let\u2019s be realistic: any licensing IP is likely to (in the great scheme of things) be far better and more widely known than you are. You may acquire some positive press for your work with it, but in many people\u2019s minds the positivity will have to do far more with the property than with you, regardless of your gifts or how much you love that universe, or whether or not you \u201ccame up through the fandom.\u201d<\/p>\n
As regards money, some licensed work will pay competitively with original work done in the same genre, but most will not. Not even being a Hot Name with a given IP will necessarily guarantee you any kind of serious money. (In particular, IP licensors have a historical tendency to pay lower-than-normally-accepted royalty rates, and in the past it has taken very energetic and insistent agents to break them of this habit, even if only temporarily and on a case-by-case basis.)<\/p>\n
It therefore stands to reason that, for the sake of your own best functioning as a writer, you need to be doing work of this kind because you really need <\/i>to do it (or to have<\/i> done it) to make yourself happy: to scratch a creative itch, or to give something back to a property\/universe that you love.<\/p>\n
Now, \u201cdo it for love\u201d can cover a lot of ground. You don\u2019t have to be head over heels in luuuurrrrve<\/i> with a property to write for it well. (In fact I suspect this state could hinder a writer\u2019s ability to do their best work for an IP. You need at least a little<\/i> separation from it so that you can realistically evaluate how what you\u2019re producing is stacking up.) You can just be in really strong like<\/i> with a given property. But you ought to be in at least some <\/i>kind of like. A personal commitment to the stylistic, rational or emotional core of a given property will get you through the times of challenge that will inevitably surround your involvement with it far <\/i>better than any unrealized hope of a big payday or of more widespread recognition of your own talents.<\/p>\n
Finally: This may sound heretical, but I don\u2019t believe that licensed work is necessarily most fruitfully viewed as a natural stepping-stone to doing original work. (Or even to becoming a licensor yourself, though that does happen.) I think that, well and thoughtfully handled at both ends of things\u2014the auctorial as well as the editorial\u2014not-your-own-IP-work can be entirely worth doing wholly for its own sake. To write for the enjoyment of readers who\u2019re using licensed work to scratch the same itch or feed the same passion that fanfic readers\/writers know\u2014of just wanting more good story<\/i> in that universe? That\u2019s entirely <\/i>honorable employment, in my book. You\u2019re an entertainer! Entertain,<\/i> and fear nothing.<\/p>\n
(And read your contracts closely.) \ud83d\ude42<\/p>\n
HTH!<\/p>\n